The Colorado Secretary of State’s Title Board will consider 11 proposed ballot measures aimed at everything from giving local governments greater control over the state-regulated industry to increasing setbacks of rigs away from homes and schools up to three quarters of a mile. Two more proposed initiatives would impose an outright ban on the controversial drilling process of hydraulic fracturing and guarantee Colorado residents the right to a healthy environment.

Proponents of the initiatives, which have been in the works since last fall, say they will narrow the 11 ballot questions down to just one or two next month. All 11 would amend the state’s constitution if passed by voters. If approved by the secretary of state, the proponents—Coloradans Resisting Extreme Energy Development—have until Aug. 8 to gather 98,492 valid signatures of registered voters on each measure in order to make it on the Nov. 8 ballot.

“We will not be gathering signatures for all of our issues, probably one or two. The final decision will be made by our board [this] month,” said CREED Executive Director Tricia Olson, who added her group does not yet have any major funders. “CREED was formed by the grassroots and has been funded so far by the grassroots.”

Opponents of the initiatives such as the issues committee Protecting Colorado’s Environment, Economy, and Energy Independence say they have yet to decide on countermeasures like the two pro-industry initiatives that were floated but ultimately pulled in 2014 in response to a pair of anti-fracking questions that were backed but later pulled by U.S. Rep. Jared Polis, a Democrat from Boulder.

“Regarding pro-industry measures, we haven’t made any decisions yet, but are considering all our options,” PCEEEI spokeswoman Karen Crummy said. “These extreme and irresponsible measures would kill jobs, ignore established laws and devastate Colorado’s economy.”

Polis in a statement last week discounted the new state rules, which resulted from a deal he struck with Gov. John Hickenlooper in 2014 to pull his two ballot questions—one of which mandated a 2,000-foot setback. Hickenlooper set up an oil and gas task force to recommend local-control rules, but after 18 months of deliberation both sides were dissatisfied.

The state maintains primacy in regulating oil and gas drilling, but community activist groups have been pushing hard for greater municipal and county control over where companies can drill in increasingly populated areas around the state.

“Setbacks and giving communities a legitimate say on what kind of industrial activity is appropriate in backyards and schoolyards are reasonable solutions that ought to be considered,” Polis said in a prepared statement.

Current state regulations require drilling operations to be set back at least 500 feet from homes and 1,000 feet from higher occupancy buildings such as schools and hospitals. On the high end, CREED is proposing a 4,000-foot setback, which is three quarters of a mile, and on the low end 2,500 feet, which is about a half mile.

The newly adopted COGCC local-control rules require notification and consultation with local governments when major drilling operations are proposed in “Urban Mitigation Areas,” but some towns and counties want actual control over whether companies can drill within their boundaries and where that drilling can occur.

To read the rest of the story, go to RouteFifty.com.